Subject: RE: [xsl] Variables and HTML From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:10:04 -0000 |
> Why will d-o-e be deprecated in XSLT 2.0 when there are valid > use cases for > it? I think the simplest answer to that is: because it's an architectural abomination; it requires extensions to the data model that are difficult to specify and expensive to implement; it can only be made to work in special cases where the transformer and the serializer are very closely coupled, and that's something we don't want to encourage. But when you ask for the reasons why a working group made a particular decision, you might find that different people give you different answers. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Variables and HTML, Pieter Reint Siegers | Thread | Re: [xsl] Variables and HTML, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] calling two consecutive x, António Mota | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 function - faste, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |