Subject: Re: [xsl] Tricky inclusion match From: Karl Stubsjoen <kstubs@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:12:46 -0700 |
Wendell: I am much insterested in your XSLT 1.0 solution to the original colors problem. Indeed, it is the "simple" version of the problem which I am facing. Thanks. Karl On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:22:04 -0500, Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Gentlemen, > > Also, if I'm not mistaken the original colors problem could be solved very > neatly in XSLT 1.0 using keys.... > > But if that's not the real problem it doesn't much matter. > > Cheers, > Wendell > > At 01:41 PM 3/29/2005, Aron wrote: > >Karl, I guess the colors, pictures sample you posted earlier was not > >representative of your problem. So please consider posting your real > >problem in detail, including xml data, rather than just parts of any xsl > >you developed. Many respondents may prefer having data to manipulate > >rather than flying blind or inventing some of their own. > > ====================================================================== > Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com > 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 > Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 > Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML > ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Tricky inclusion match, Wendell Piez | Thread | Re: [xsl] Tricky inclusion match, Wendell Piez |
Re: RE: [xsl] New Developer Survey , Michael Champion | Date | Re: [xsl] Tricky inclusion match, Wendell Piez |
Month |