Re: [xsl] Tricky inclusion match

Subject: Re: [xsl] Tricky inclusion match
From: Karl Stubsjoen <kstubs@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:16:33 -0700
Wendell:  I'm very excited... will give this a whirl tomorrow.


On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:03:38 +0000, Aron Bock <aronbock@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Wendell, if this works (heheh) it's very cool!  It inspires me to learn
> about XSL's "built-in" set operations capabilities.
> 
> --A
> 
> >From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Reply-To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: Re: [xsl] Tricky inclusion match
> >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:26:06 -0500
> >
> >Karl,
> >
> >It turned out that keys weren't actually necessary: as posed (as I
> >understand it) the colors problem could be solved with a simple (if not
> >obvious) test. But using a key does make it slightly more efficient:
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
> http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/

Current Thread