Subject: Re: [xsl] Tricky inclusion match From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:05:57 -0500 |
I was able to put most of your stuff to work in my "real" scenario but got a little stuck because my data looks like this (hierarchely)
recordset record field
where field is "color" and recordset is "picture". So I am one deeper than the example I gave. Plus, to confuse things a little, my field name are field with attribute value name to describe the element. So the revised xml would look like (just a snippet of it):
<recordset rsName="pictures"> <record sample="1"> <field fieldname="color">red</color> <field fieldname="color">brown</color> <field fieldname="color">red</color> </record> </recordset>
I hope that nobody gets upset because I inquired with a simplified example of my data, It was easier than trying to describe the real data I had.
Cheers, Wendell
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Tricky inclusion match, Karl Stubsjoen | Thread | Re: [xsl] Tricky inclusion match, Jon Gorman |
Re: [xsl] Possible to pass 'empty s, chris | Date | Re: [xsl] Testing 2 XML documents f, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |