Subject: RE: [xsl] Possible to pass 'empty sequence' to function? From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:19:44 +0100 |
> > <xsl:variable name="y" as="string?">hello</xsl:variable> > > > > $x is (a sequence of one) string with value "hello" > > > Is this really the case? Does it really mean that the > processor doesn't > construct the temporary tree (and then atomise it?) - if so then it's > really useful. The semantics are that the processor creates a text node and then atomizes it to a string. What happens internally is of course up to the optimizer. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Possible to pass 'empty s, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | RE: [xsl] Possible to pass 'empty s, Andrew Welch |
RE: [xsl] grouping problem, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] Possible to pass 'empty s, Andrew Welch |
Month |