Subject: Re: [xsl] imperative/OO language with XML syntax?|
From: Barry Lay <blay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:00:12 -0500
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 08:42:03AM -0500, Tim Lewis wrote:I had a quick look at this one as the subject interested me as well. From my initial glance it looks like the authors were trying to improve on XSLT 1.0 in order to deal with many of the issues that have seen discussion on this list. From my reading much of it has been at least touched on with XSLT 2.0, albeit with different syntax. I would be interested to know if anyone has used both and can comment.
You might want to take a look at:
They have a full implementation of an xml-based OO language with various extensions for database access, unit testing, and other goodies.
Sweet... that's precisely what I was looking for but couldn't seem to find...