Subject: Re: [xsl] Compatibility question From: James Fuller <jim.fuller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 10:50:58 +0200 |
Pawson, David wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Camalesn > > Looking for Ajax+xsl* on Google I found this article**, not > very promising... > > * http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=AJAX%2Bxsl > ** > http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2005/03/ajax_promise_or.html > >Quoting this latter reference: > ><q>I wouldn't have added XSLT to the stew, because it will never become a viable client side technology. It does the same thing as JavaScript, but in a more complicated way.</q> > >How's that for a description of what XSLT does! > > > sacre, at least we can be thankful that the volatility/difference between XSLT implementations is magnitudes lower then that of javascript implementations. --Jim Fuller
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Compatibility question, Pawson, David | Thread | Re: [xsl] Compatibility question, Colin Paul Adams |
RE: [xsl] Compatibility question, Pawson, David | Date | RE: [xsl] Text To XML using XSL, Pawson, David |
Month |