Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST) From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:30:31 +0200 |
Dimitre Novatchev wrote: > What is really not elegant at all in XSLT 2.0 is the impossibility to > define user data types inline in a stylesheet -- forcing the > programmer to artificially separate in different files type definition > from type usage makes XSLT 2.0 rather unique... :( > > Of course, one would also like to see nested sequences, type classes > and type equations... Maybe XSLT 2.0 is just temporary language which will be shortly superseded by something called Haskslt or HasXSLT :-D -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@xxxxxxxx http://www.kosek.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Profesionalnm 9kolenm a poradenstvm v oblasti technologim XML. Podmvejte se na na9 novl spu9tln} web http://DocBook.cz Podrobn} pxehled 9kolenm http://xmlguru.cz/skoleni/ ------------------------------------------------------------------ [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s]
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Jeni Tennison |
[xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Jeni Tennison |
Month |