Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST) From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:33:43 +0100 |
Hi Dimitre, > What is really not elegant at all in XSLT 2.0 is the impossibility to > define user data types inline in a stylesheet -- forcing the > programmer to artificially separate in different files type definition > from type usage makes XSLT 2.0 rather unique... :( Since the November 2004 Working Draft, you can nest a (WXS) schema within an <xsl:import-schema> element, so you can define data types within the stylesheet module if you want. This only applies to Schema-Aware XSLT processors, of course. Cheers, Jeni --- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Jirka Kosek | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Dimitre Novatchev |
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Jirka Kosek | Date | RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Michael Kay |
Month |