Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST) From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 20:50:11 +1000 |
> A much better name in this particular case would be "define-schema" Even better: define-type Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Eric van der Vlist | Date | Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Na, James Fuller |
Month |