Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST)

Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST)
From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 20:50:11 +1000
> A much better name in this particular case would be "define-schema"

Even better:

    define-type


Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev.

Current Thread