RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST)

Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST)
From: "Pawson, David" <David.Pawson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:59:29 +0100
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Michael Kay 
    
    > What is really not elegant at all in XSLT 2.0 is the 
    impossibility to 
    > define user data types inline in a stylesheet
    
    But you can!

And what is the equivalent in relax-ng?
Anyone know?

regards DaveP


    
    <xsl:stylesheet ...
    
    <xsl:import-schema namespace="http://localhost/";>
      <xs:schema targetNamespace="http://localhost";>
        <xs:simpleType name="hatSize">
          <xs:restriction base="xs:unsignedInteger">
            <xs:maxInclusive value="10"/>
          </xs:restriction>
        </xs:simpleType>
      </xs:schema>
    </xsl:import-schema>
    
    <xsl:function name="my:measurements" as="my:hatSize">
      ...
    </xsl:function>
    
    </xsl:stylesheet>
    
    Michael Kay
    http://www.saxonica.com/
    
    

-- 
DISCLAIMER:

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be privileged.  If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the 
content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the 
sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it 
and any attachments from your system.

RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by
its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants.  However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any  such which are transmitted.
We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and 
any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk

Current Thread