Subject: Re: [xsl] XSL-FO & Selecting Attributes From: Jon Gorman <jonathan.gorman@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:01:24 -0500 |
On 4/20/05, craig webber <craigwebber@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I don't want to presume to speak for David, but I feel I should point > out that the "fixed" code has been posted twice now. Of course, there > may be a delay on my end and it may not have made it to the list. In > that case there will just be three instances of the fixed code. > > Thank you, I know understand. Problem solved. > I was looking my earlier email and I realized the tone of my last email might have been rough or at least interpreted negatively. My sincere apologies if I did offend anyone. I just was unsure of what anyone could add that hadn't already been posted without more information. Several working snippets of code were posted after a short period of unfortunate typos. I'm glad to hear the problem is fixed. Jon Gorman
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSL-FO & Selecting Attrib, craig webber | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSL-FO & Selecting Attrib, craig webber |
Re: [xsl] conditional position(), Wendell Piez | Date | Re: [xsl] conditional position(), Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |