Subject: Re: [xsl] following-sibling and xsl:sort From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 18:57:02 -0400 |
Me too. Turing completeness is not the same as closure over the data model. To take an obvious example, there is no way of creating a result tree that contains an unparsed entity, even though the data model allows unparsed entities to exist.
-- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published! http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/ http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] following-sibling and xsl, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] following-sibling and xsl, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] following-sibling and xsl, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] following-sibling and xsl, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |