Subject: Re: [xsl] Saxon for windows? From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 09:05:32 +1000 |
On 6/4/05, Pieter Reint Siegers Kort <pieter.siegers@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > More than inefficient, it would be dangerous to run an XSLT processor as > part of a *generally available* web service (I can only smile envisioning > the kinds of creative DOS attacks that would be possible). > > Coming back to what you've said, I'm not envisioning a *generally available* > web service at all - that part about using web services was mixed in by a > few other participants. I already said that using ws will incorporate > unnecessary overhead, let alone start-up costs. So there's no way I would be > having DOS attacks. > > Cheers, > Pieter It's good you realised I never said *you* will have DOS attacks :o) Cheers, Dimitre
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Saxon for windows?, Pieter Reint Siegers | Thread | RE: [xsl] Saxon for windows?, Pieter Reint Siegers |
RE: [xsl] Saxon for windows?, Pieter Reint Siegers | Date | Re: [xsl] Dynamically controlling s, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |