Re: [xsl] Anybody know when "transform" became the term for the type ofthing XSLT does?

[Peter Gerstbach <peter.gerstbach@xxxxxxx>]

Andrew Welch wrote:
> I bet everyone still uses <xsl:stylesheet> over <xsl:transform> (I know
> I do...even though it makes far more sense to use the latter!)

You could use <xsl:transform> for a data-centric stylesheet(?) and 
<xsl:stylesheet> for a stylesheet that creates an XSL-FO document or 
something similar.

This would indicate what kind of stylesheet it is; but it may confuse 
many people, that don't know the alias <xsl:transform>.

Peter