Subject: RE: [xsl] Key problem. Ordering XML with conditions than generate new associations. From: "Gabriel Osorio" <gosorio@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 09:09:50 -0500 |
Forgive me my confusion. I lost a link in the chain. Thanks for your guide. I'll study that conscientiously. Gabriel -----Original Message----- From: Ragulf Pickaxe [mailto:ragulf.pickaxe@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 3:09 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] Key problem. Ordering XML with conditions than generate new associations. Hi Gabriel, On 9/28/05, Gabriel Osorio <gosorio@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > About: "RE: [xsl] Another <xsl:key> problem " > > My intentions are educational. :-) I'm a beginner. > .. > Really I do not have opinion. I used your template and did not obtain > results, because of it I sent the xml again. > > Your recursion solution is elegant, but I can't understand the siblings use. > Ah, I think you confuse Geert and me. I made a scetch for Aaron, which was by no means a working solution. Therefore it would not work without modification. For the siblings use (and other things), I would recommend David Pawsons FAQ: http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl/sect2/sect21.html Regards, Ragulf Pickaxe :-)
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Key problem. Ordering XML, Gabriel Osorio | Thread | [xsl] weird problem of non shown te, Roel Dillen |
RE: [xsl] Key problem. Ordering XML, Gabriel Osorio | Date | Re: [xsl] Muenchian Grouping and Su, omprakash . v |
Month |