Subject: RE: [xsl] Merging 2 XML's in to 1 output XML (Performance Issue) From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:15:29 +0100 |
> SAXON did improve the performance more than 10 times > comparing to > XALAN. I wonder why people are still using XALAN. Are there > any specific > areas where XALAN performs better than SAXON?? I'll leave others to answer those questions... > > I have one more question. Is there any difference in performance using > 'Saxon-SA' comparing to 'Saxon-B'? The answer is that most of the time it makes no difference, but some of the time it makes a big difference, because there are one or two optimizations in Saxon-SA that are not present in Saxon-B: these are generally related to performing joins. In fairness, some people have reported that the start-up time for Saxon-B can be a little faster: this is because there is less code, so the JVM loads it more quickly. > Anyhow I will try SAXON-SA in coming > weeks. Good work Mike, your parser is a super fast engine. Thanks. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Merging 2 XML's in to 1 o, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Merging 2 XML's in to 1 o, Elliotte Harold |
[xsl] Re: Complicated transformatio, knocte | Date | RE: [xsl] rogue xmlns="" in output , Michael Kay |
Month |