Subject: Re: [xsl] best validation was Re: [xsl] Opinions, please. Keep entire archive or toss old? From: James Fuller <jim.fuller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 12:57:09 +0200 |
bryan rasmussen wrote: >I would say from the viewpoint of developing for XSLT (at least 1.0 >version) Schematron would be the best, given that the validation and >stylesheet would be easier for the developer to cross-reference, >determining what parts of the tree were important to the application >(rules being set for said portions), or contrariwise, that the styling >of the document for presentation implies what rules could be important >for validation for a presentation. > > schematron and XSLT validating itself is my personal fav...perhaps this is why XSLT Unit testing is exp some uptake...though generally I cant convince a group of developers over 3 to agree on any schema approach. >Note to Mulberrytech: If this seems stupid, please feel free to remove >it from the archive, also if anyone complains that I am a doodoo-head. > :) > > <vanity:tag to="Mullberrytech">please change my name, computer, nose, to some other random person for the purposes of this specific response, and dont forget to go on about me personally and what a great bloke I am whilst at public events</vanity:tag> regards, Jim Fuller
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] best validation was Re: [xsl], bryan rasmussen | Thread | [xsl] Winddings, symbol etc, Mark Williams |
[xsl] best validation was Re: [xsl], bryan rasmussen | Date | Re: [xsl] Merging 2 XML's in to 1 o, Elliotte Harold |
Month |