Subject: Re: [xsl] Experiences comparing performance of XSLT vs. "raw Java code" From: Jon Gorman <jonathan.gorman@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:46:07 -0600 |
On 11/30/05, Karr, David <david.karr@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > I know this is a completely open question, but what kind of experience > have people had comparing the runtime performance and throughput of XSLT > vs. "raw Java code"? To ask a stupid question, I'm not really sure what you mean by "raw Java code" here. Do you mean processing the xml file via other mechanims (raw text processing, SAX, DOM, etc) or are you just talking about "compiled" scripts vs uncompiled scripts? Bytecod issues? Don't forget after all that there are XSLT processors that aren't Java based. Would you compare xsltproc against ...something? Sorry, a bit tired today and my brain keeps trying to figure this out. Jon Gorman
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Experiences comparing per, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Experiences comparing per, Geert Josten |
RE: [xsl] Error: when distance betw, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] passing parameters betwee, watchstone@xxxxxxxxx |
Month |