Subject: RE: [xsl] Is letting the browser transform XML to XHTML using XSLT a good choice? From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 17:36:51 -0000 |
> So is it a good idea to rely on these three browsers' > XSLT processor to do the transformation, or should I > look into other tools? If yes, what are the tools that > I should consider? Unless you really need the interactivity that you can get from client-side transformation, my choice would be to do it server-side. It avoids a lot of hassle. > > And what's the best method of generating PDFs from > these XML files? Probably depends on the quality you're after. XSL-FO is the best way, but not necessarily the cheapest (in license costs but more importantly in skills acquisition costs). Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Is letting the browser tr, andrew welch | Thread | RE: [xsl] Is letting the browser tr, Jesper Tverskov |
Re: [xsl] Is letting the browser tr, andrew welch | Date | RE: [xsl] Is letting the browser tr, Nathan Young -X \(na |
Month |