Subject: RE: [xsl] plea for help... From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 19:00:15 -0000 |
> As long as I'm already on it, however, I am willing to comment that > the scope and difficulty of conversion B is directly related both to > the quality of tagging in your source (HTML can be "clean" or > "dirty", consistent or messy, even after it's made XML-conformant in > its syntax) and, most dramatically, to the nature of your target tag > set and to the feasibility of mapping from the HTML you have > to this target. It's also strongly related to the *consistency* of the tagging in your input. The HTML may be filthy, but if it's all generated by the same tool and that tool generates filthy HTML consistently, your problem is greatly reduced. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] plea for help..., Wendell Piez | Thread | RE: [xsl] plea for help..., Mike Ferrando |
RE: [xsl] Escaping nodeset content, Kipp . Howard | Date | RE: [xsl] xmlns print and enumerate, Michele Vivoda |
Month |