Subject: RE: [xsl] feasibility of HTML input From: didoss@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 20:37:54 +0000 |
The mischief in me says to go ahead and change it,...and see who notices. :) -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: didoss@xxxxxxxxxxx > Yes, I'm looking into that, so that the existing stuff is unaffected and I can > proceed with the enhancement. > > My concern is that the current output takes a lot of space - hence my only > copying off the very top layer for historical - so I have to see whether I can > output to both without taking twice the space,...I know space shouldn't be the > hot commodity these days, but it is at my office,... > > I'm also not sure of the time impact of producing both outputs, so will have to > be cautious of that as well. We run a nightlybuild that already takes longer > than it should, so I don't want to make it worse. > > Most of the developers probably would have no problem if I completely switched > the results over to xml, but I think the business analysts and project managers > would have problems reading the output. > > > thanks, > Dianne > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: "Jerry Kimmel" <jkimmel@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Dianne, > > > > If it is possible to have JUnit and Emma produce XML and you do not want > > to interfere with your existing outputs, why don't you create both HTML > > and XML from your existing tools. That way you'll have your reports in > > both formats. > > > > ------------------------------------------ > > Jerry Kimmel - jkimmel at vasont dot com > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: didoss@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:didoss@xxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 1:06 PM > > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [xsl] feasibility of HTML input > > > > David - > > > > I was hoping not to interfere with the existing outputs,...I can go down > > that path if this one is not worthwhile. > > > > Dianne > > > > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > > From: David Wright <dave-xsl@xxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > I'm a bit puzzled - a quick google suggests that it isn't hard to get > > both > > > JUnit and Emma to produce XML reports, as well as HTML. You'd be much > > > better off parsing that, than the user-friendly HTML. Is there a > > reason > > > why you can't? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > David Wright
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] feasibility of HTML input, didoss | Thread | [xsl] Identity Transformation of XM, Karl Stubsjoen |
RE: [xsl] feasibility of HTML input, didoss | Date | RE: [xsl] Parameter passing through, William Scarvie |
Month |