Subject: RE: [xsl] FW: XSLT 2.0 unit testing utility (Jeni Tennison's temp lates) From: "Weston, Toby" <toby.weston@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 12:09:04 -0000 |
Excellent, thanks David! It works great with that change :) Incidentally, have people adapted this to run from something like Ant? I was thinking about doing something along those lines... Thanks again, Toby -----Original Message----- From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@ Sent: 21 March 2006 11:54 To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] FW: XSLT 2.0 unit testing utility (Jeni Tennison's templates) That's the thing about draft specifications; they change:-) > instance of void()" They changed the name of the type associated with an empty sequence from void() to empty-sequence() http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20/#id-log-050707 (item 7) David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] transformix xsl processor, Robert Koberg | Thread | [xsl] Re: Un-cdata-section-elements, yguaba |
Re: [xsl] FW: XSLT 2.0 unit testing, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] FW: XSLT 2.0 unit testing, Michael Kay |
Month |