Subject: Re: [xsl] xsL:with-param, xsl:-param emptiness, Xalan and xsltproc From: Kasimier Buchcik <K.Buchcik@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 18:10:05 +0100 |
Hi, On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 17:23 +0100, Kasimier Buchcik wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 10:04 -0600, Eric White wrote: > > Kasimier Buchcik wrote: > > > > >Use curly braces around the param's name: > > > No joy.... I'm still working through the template priority logic... > > Michael's suggestion about template defaults sounds encouraging. > > True, I'm sorry, what I proposed was totally incorrect :-( I tried your stylesheet (just added an indent="yes") with the following input, and observed the following: type param.xml <?xml version="1.0"?> <physInterfaceTableRow><physInterfaceOsName>eth1</physInterfaceOsName><physInterfaceDuplex/></physInterfaceTableRow> xsltproc param.xsl param.xml <?xml version="1.0"?> <physInterfaceTableRow> <physInterfaceOsName>eth1</physInterfaceOsName> <physInterfaceDuplex></physInterfaceDuplex> </physInterfaceTableRow><physInterfaceOsName>eth1</physInterfaceOsName><physInterfaceDuplex>full</physInterfaceDuplex> Note that this creates: <physInterfaceDuplex>full</physInterfaceDuplex> so it looks like the param was used in this case. MSXML.NET produces the same result. Regards, Kasimier
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xsL:with-param, xsl:-para, Kasimier Buchcik | Thread | RE: [xsl] xsL:with-param, xsl:-para, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] Need help OR'ing in XPATH, Wendell Piez | Date | Re: [xsl] Natural Logarithms using , Wendell Piez |
Month |