Subject: RE: [xsl] Absolute/relative positioning of graphic in XSL-FO From: "Hood, Earl" <earl.hood@xxxxxx> Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 17:13:02 -0500 |
> The following works in Antenna House, but I see that it does not work > in XEP ... I had anticipated it would: > > <block-container block-progression-dimension.minimum="3cm"> > <block>Test1</block> > </block-container> > <block>Test 1 end</block> > <block-container block-progression-dimension.minimum="3cm"> > <block>Test2</block> > <block>Test2</block> > <block>Test2</block> > <block>Test2</block> > <block>Test2</block> > <block>Test2</block> > <block>Test2</block> > <block>Test2</block> > <block>Test2</block> > <block>Test2</block> > </block-container> > <block>Test 2 end</block> Thanks for the info. I tried something like above with the transforms I'm currently working on, and XEP does not appear to do the "right thing". I even tried some variations (e.g. using block-progression-dimension on <fo:block>s and experimenting interchanging block and block-container), but nothing I tried gave the desired effect. Things would look okay if the textual data was small, but once I increased the amount of text, the graphic did not move down. I'll try to contact RenderX support to see what they have to say. Thanks again, --ewh
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Absolute/relative positio, G. Ken Holman | Thread | [xsl] Writing array elements based , neil cave |
Re: [xsl] Absolute/relative positio, G. Ken Holman | Date | Re: [xsl] Passing variables into XS, Duncan Anker |
Month |