Subject: RE: [xsl] Namespace prefixes in Schemas From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 12:32:45 +0100 |
> So "to match the namespace URI rather than the prefix" should > be the correct beahviour of any XPath processor Yes. XPath 1.0 section 2.3: A node test that is a QName is true if and only if the type of the node (see [5 Data Model]) is the principal node type and has an expanded-name equal to the expanded-name specified by the QName. section 5: an expanded-name... is a pair consisting of a local part and a namespace URI Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Namespace prefixes in Sch, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Namespace prefixes in Sch, Abel Online |
Re: [xsl] Namespace prefixes in Sch, Abel Online | Date | [xsl] if statement, vanaja selvaraj |
Month |