Re: [xsl] Why no namespace node KindTest?

Subject: Re: [xsl] Why no namespace node KindTest?
From: Frans Englich <frans.englich@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 09:23:25 +0000
On Saturday 26 August 2006 22:14, Michael Kay wrote:
[...]

> One of the things I learnt from James was that
> when someone argues against a specification on the grounds that it is
> impossible to implement efficiently, they are usually wrong.

Could you elaborate? E.g, why is implementation efficiency, usually, not a 
valid reason?


Cheers,

		Frans

Current Thread