Re: [xsl] What is a better word for "de-duplication"?

[Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 07:43 PM 8/28/2006, Dimitre wrote:
> Certainly "duplicate elimination" is precise and clear and of course I
> knew about this phrase and still asked my initial question. Why?
>
> Because I was looking for a single word to describe the set of nodes
> resulting from duplicate elimination.
>
> While I can say
>
>     "factorised nodes"
>
> it is quite awkward to say:
>
>   "duplicate-eliminated" nodes.
>
> and
>
>  "nodes with eliminated duplicates"
>
> is a long, 4-word phrase.

For that I'd probably say "uniquely-valued nodes" or, since I don't 
much like the word "unique" (mainly since it's so commonly abused 
these days to mean "special"), then "distinctly-valued nodes" or 
(when talking in the context, for example, of Muenchian grouping) 
"representative nodes".

Cheers,
Wendell