Subject: Re: [xsl] What is a better word for "de-duplication"? From: "Jay Bryant" <jay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:00:54 -0500 |
> For that I'd probably say "uniquely-valued nodes" or, since I don't > much like the word "unique" (mainly since it's so commonly abused > these days to mean "special"), then "distinctly-valued nodes" or > (when talking in the context, for example, of Muenchian grouping) > "representative nodes". However, one shouldn't hyphenate adverbs, so these terms should be "uniquely valued nodes" or "distinctly valued nodes". Yes, I know it's a nitpick, but, since it may end up in various printed articles, let's get it right and make a better impression.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] What is a better word for, Wendell Piez | Thread | Re: [xsl] What is a better word for, Jay Bryant |
RE: [xsl] force apostrophed attribu, Wendell Piez | Date | [xsl] Ann Marie Rubin (anrubin), Ann Marie Rubin \(an |
Month |