Subject: Re: [xsl] Deescaping Atom brain damage From: Frans Englich <frans.englich@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:35:17 +0200 |
On Monday 23 October 2006 18:45, David Carlisle wrote: > > However, that's an approach that can leave you with non well-formed XML, > > assuming the "input"(whatever that is defined to be) is invalid. Right? > > yes but it depends what you are doing. If the stylesheet is using the > html output method the result isn't well formed xml anyway so adding > some more html which is not xml to it is not in itself bad. Yeah, but it could turn into not even valid HTML(that is, tag soup). Browsers eat tag soup for breakfest(that sounds wrong, and so it is), so probably it will come out in some acceptable way at the user's end. But of course, the programmer lost his respect by cooking it. Nope, not that I have a clean solution for all this(beyond hitting the original content producer with a stick). Cheers, Frans
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Deescaping Atom brain dam, David Carlisle | Thread | [xsl] DTD error in Output, Brook Ellingwood |
[xsl] XSLT 1.0: How to spit out uni, Henesy, Susan | Date | Re: [xsl] xinclude in XSLT[2], Erik Wilde |
Month |