Subject: Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in browsers, was: Re [xsl] XHTML html validation From: "Manfred Staudinger" <manfred.staudinger@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 22:40:19 +0100 |
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:32:21 -0500, Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Too all that are listening in: I advice Sarissa if you do browser based > transformations. That will save you quite some hassle (it unifies the > interface) and works for all browsers that support XSLT. >
some browsers support some types of transforms and some of XSLT. For example Safari does not support JS transforms (you have to use a PI). Opera does not support (still...) the document function. Firefox and MS IE are your best bets if you want to control client-side XSL with JS (i.e. with something like Sarissa, or dojo).
There is another downside of Sarissa as it uses active-x. In corporate and government networks you will find it frequently disabled. A better solution would have been to use a PI and to load the document into iframes. This way the transformation is not dependent on JS either.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in brows, Robert Koberg | Thread | Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in brows, Abel Braaksma |
Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in brows, Robert Koberg | Date | Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in brows, Abel Braaksma |
Month |