Subject: Re: [xsl] Universally quantified test of child attribute presence/absence From: Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:17:48 +0100 |
While the expression for the positive test obviously is
every $child in * satisfies $child/@my_attribute
I am unsure about the correct form of the negated expression to mandate that no child may have that attribute. Which variant can or must be used, and why?
every $child in * satisfies $child[not(@my_attribute)]
every $child in * satisfies not($child/@my_attribute)
not(every $child in * satisfies $child/@my_attribute)
Cheers, -- Abel Braaksma
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Universally quantified test o, Yves Forkl | Thread | Re: [xsl] Universally quantified te, Abel Braaksma |
[xsl] Universally quantified test o, Yves Forkl | Date | Re: [xsl] Universally quantified te, David Carlisle |
Month |