Subject: RE: [xsl] PHP XSL adds Content-Type meta From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 12:30:56 +0100 |
> I peeked. It says: "The value must be a QName. If the QName > does not have a prefix, then it identifies a method specified > in this document and must be one of xml, html or text" > > Meaning: it is an error if you specify something else than > these three (unless in XSLT 2.0, where 'xhtml' was added). If you implement something that's defined in 2.0 but otherwise follow what's in 1.0, then you can't claim a conformance tick against either version of the spec, but I don't think you're necessarily doing something evil... Though I got the impression here that they were inferring XHTML from the use of method="xml" and doctype-system="....", which is definitely a departure from the spec. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] PHP XSL adds Content-Type, Abel Braaksma | Thread | Re: [xsl] PHP XSL adds Content-Type, Alexander Johannesen |
Re: [xsl] PHP XSL adds Content-Type, Abel Braaksma | Date | Re: [xsl] PHP XSL adds Content-Type, Alexander Johannesen |
Month |