Subject: Re: [xsl] Dynamic pipelining in XSLT 2.0 w/ Saxon extensions From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 10:32:11 -0400 |
> * Are there any obvious pitfalls or problems with this > approach? (Or any not so obvious?) How does it compare to > other methods?
I'm inclined to think that a general purpose pipeline processor will do the job better. It's likely to have memory management that's better adapted to this kind of work, and debugging facilities to examine the documents at any stage of the pipeline or to switch validation of intermediate steps on and off, etc. If you're lucky it might even allow distributed or asynchronous execution of the pipeline.
Does XProc fit here?
http://www.w3.org/TR/xproc/ (or http://xproc.org)
As an aside, if your architecture is batch transforming directories, where multiple transforms are performed in sequence, then Kernow [1] might be a good fit.
Cheers, Wendell
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Dynamic pipelining in XSL, Andrew Welch | Thread | RE: [xsl] Dynamic pipelining in XSL, Wendell Piez |
RE: [xsl] Dynamic pipelining in XSL, Wendell Piez | Date | Re: [xsl] Dynamic pipelining in XSL, Wendell Piez |
Month |