Subject: RE: [xsl] <quote>XSL is NOT easy</quote> From: "Steven Janoff" <Steven.Janoff@xxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:56:34 -0700 |
She's addressing the dearth of women in computing. The blog entry (linked below) is entitled "How to get women into computing." -- Steve Janoff Information Manager, Specialty Engineering General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc. Tel. (858) 909-5164 Fax (858) 455-4668 Steven.Janoff@xxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: Kamal Bhatt [mailto:kbhatt@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 3:34 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] <quote>XSL is NOT easy</quote> M. David Peterson wrote: > > Can't help but agree 100%. In addition, via Jeni Tennison @ > http://www.jenitennison.com/blog/node/30 > > <quote> > With that in mind, look at how Ruby on Rails is marketed. A big play > is made of how easy it is. But if a language or framework is easy then > people with low self-efficacy can't win: if they manage to do > something with it then they haven't really achieved very much because > anyone can do it; if they don't manage to do something with it then > they're complete idiots. I'm not saying that we should advertise > languages or frameworks as being hard, because obviously that can put > people off as well, but a recognition of the barriers that people > might face may, in a strange way, make them more approachable. > > This is also an issue for trainers: we need to be able to boost the > self-efficacy of the people we train (particularly women) by setting > them challenging (but achievable) tasks and not giving them too much > help to achieve them. > </quuote> Why particularly women? Not that anyone outside of Jeni Tennison could answer that. -- Kamal Bhatt
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] <quote>XSL is NOT easy</q, Kamal Bhatt | Thread | RE: [xsl] <quote>XSL is NOT easy</q, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] <quote>XSL is NOT easy</q, Kamal Bhatt | Date | Re: [xsl] <quote>XSL is NOT easy</q, Wendell Piez |
Month |