Subject: Re: [xsl] Understanding why <tag></tag> is the way it is (was Re: [xsl] IE Client side transformation issue) From: "Manfred Staudinger" <manfred.staudinger@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 20:37:34 +0200 |
On 03/08/07, G. Ken Holman <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > At 2007-08-03 19:19 +0200, Manfred Staudinger wrote: > >On 03/08/07, Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > There is a cdata-section-elements on xsl:output, but not a > > > never-minimize-elements attribute or something similar. > >There is no need for such an attribute, because MSXML3 handles > >the two cases differently. If you specify in your stylesheet > ><div style="display: none"/> it becomes <div style="display: none" /> > >(invalid html) > >but > ><div style="display: none"></div> becomes <div style="display: none"></div> > >in the output. > > > >Note that there is _no_ need to using nbsp or xsl:comment to ensure > >valid html ! > > I disagree with your summary above based on my own experiences that > when using the HTML serialization with MSXML and other tools. The > distinction you make is for XML serialization, not for HTML > serialization. Speaking only about serialization with MSXML this holds for both xsl:output methods, XML and HTML. Why do you think its different for HTML? Manfred
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Understanding why <tag></, G. Ken Holman | Thread | Re: [xsl] Understanding why <tag></, G. Ken Holman |
Re: [xsl] Understanding why <tag></, G. Ken Holman | Date | [xsl] translate to XML using XSL i, oryann9 |
Month |