Subject: Re: [xsl] translate to XML using XSL into an HTML table From: Florent Georges <darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 11:27:11 +0200 (CEST) |
B Tommie Usdin wrote: Hi > There is nothing at all wrong with talking about TAGs on > XSL-List, when the discussion is about tags. In this case, > the discussion is about an element, and it is important to > use the jargon correctly. > The "T-word", as Florent puts it, is not a dirty word on > XSL-List. It is simply not an synonym of "element", and is > something we rarely need to discuss in the context of XSL. Yes, of course. But I think 99% of the time I saw it on the list it was misused. This is a frequent mistake, and I think this is a sympthom of misunderstanding XDM basics, which are *really* important to write any stylesheet. "Never" was maybe a little too strong, yes. > (I am, perhaps, in too persnickety a mood - I am writing ^^^^^^^^^^^ Nice word. I have to remember this one ;-) > from the International Workshop on Markup of Overlapping > Structures. I am surrounded by markup geeks and we all > seem to be deeply concerned about precise descriptions of > very fuzzy concepts.) Oh, I didn't notice Extreme started today. Pleasure to all lucky attendees! Regards, --drkm _____________________________________________________________________________ Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo! Mail
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Example to checkbox in X, Abel Braaksma (onlin | Thread | Re: [xsl] translate to XML using X, Abel Braaksma |
RE: [xsl] Stepping through XPath in, Philip Fearon | Date | RE: [xsl] Format Number and Empy El, Michael Kay |
Month |