Subject: Re: [xsl] Taking flat XML and parsing into multi level nexted From: "Abel Braaksma (online)" <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 15:53:49 +0200 (CEST) |
>> Instead of Muenchian, if you really *have* to stick to XSLT 1.0, > ^^^^^^^^ > > The Muenchian method is defined and used with XSLT 1.0, why users who > have to stick to XSLT 1.0 should not use it? > In this particular case, I think that the tree-walking algorithm suits better than the Muenchian grouping method with keys (which may yield an interesting discussion on its own). Someone did come up with a good tree walking solution, not sure if a similar thing with Muenchian would be equally easy/hard (I'll leave the comparison of the two for this case to others). > > P.S. > Abel, I tried to reach you via email, probably do not have your > correct email address. I see it now. It got filed in the xsl archive instead in my normal inbox. Answer underway ;) Cheers, -- Abel Braaksma
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Taking flat XML and parsi, christoph . naber | Thread | [xsl] Re: Format Number and Empy El, Mark Anderson |
Re: [xsl] Taking flat XML and parsi, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT and natural semantic, Garvin Riensche |
Month |