Subject: Re: [xsl] Getting variable yet most immediate parentNode From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:02:06 +0100 |
me>(@value,@name,.)[1] wendell> ... and in XPath 1.0, you're forced into explicit testing, since wendell> attributes have no order in the data model. or, if you must, (@value|@name[not(../@value)]|.)[last()] but perhaps's that's "explicit testing". How explicit does something have to be to be "explicit"? David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Getting variable yet most, Wendell Piez | Thread | Re: [xsl] Getting variable yet most, Abel Braaksma |
Re: [xsl] Future of XSL Stylesheet , Jim Melton | Date | [xsl] Attribute of greatest value f, Steve |
Month |