Subject: Re: [xsl] ANN: 'Testing XSLT' training course PDF available From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:15:21 +0000 |
On 17/12/2007, Tony Graham <Tony.Graham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It's not "unit testing" then... surely? > > I didn't say that it was unit testing We're in agreement then ;) My original comment was only to note that you had the black-box testing subheading under the main heading of unit testing - which I thought was wrong for a document intended to teach people. If I said to someone to add some black box tests and they wrote a load of unit tests, I wouldn't be very happy... (especially if they'd just come back from a course on testing) Just because some "XSLT unit test frameworks" can operate at the transform level, it doesn't suddenly alter the meaning of the terms involved. -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] ANN: 'Testing XSLT' train, Tony Graham | Thread | Re: [xsl] ANN: 'Testing XSLT' train, Florent Georges |
RE: [xsl] Testing for Last Group in, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Identity transformation f, David Carlisle |
Month |