Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLTPROC performance From: Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:13:36 +0100 |
First of all I introduce myself, I'm Giulio from Italy.
I am required to write some extension function to a libxml compliant xslt processor.
(performance is the highest requirement),
Is any other solution alternative to the two I've mentioned? The problem is that is about 6 years that XSLTPROC have been used and the new (?) processor must give the same results as XSLTPROC.
Last question, the optimum will be to be able to use a java XSLT processor, but I must be sure that it is 100% compliant with the results of an XSLTPROC execution on the same input.
Cheers, -- Abel Braaksma
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLTPROC performance, Tony Graham | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLTPROC performance, Giulio Rizzo |
[xsl] [Ann] oXygen XML editor 9.1, George Cristian Bina | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLTPROC performance, Giulio Rizzo |
Month |