Subject: Re: XS: Ports --> math From: Paul Prescod <papresco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 23 May 1997 11:45:05 -0400 (EDT) |
> i have a worry that math is deprecated because its regarded as `hard', > but things like sidelines are added because they are not much trouble. Removing something because it is hard is entirely appropriate. We have done that frequently in the XML effort. > my view is that if math objects are not mentioned in XS, it kills > stone dead the chance that M'soft or N'scape will support math, and > puts back the day we can do full scientific publishing on the Web by > another 3 or 4 years. Not at all. Browsers will merely have Math display semantics *hard-coded* to the MathML DTD. XS would give a layer of indirection that would allow different DTDs, but probably nobody cares too much about that. > you might equally argue that the inclusion of > what is regarded as esoterica will kill XS :-} That's why we need to be strict about hard to-implement features. Paul Prescod DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XS: Ports --> math, Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | Re: XS: Ports --> math, Sebastian Rahtz |
Re: XS: needed features?, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | Re: XS: Ports --> math, Sebastian Rahtz |
Month |