Subject: RE: Modular Docbook v1.13 bug From: "Pawson, David" <DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 1998 14:41:04 +0100 |
> | And here is what I get now (both in TOC and document): > | > | I. part > | 1. Chapter > | SimpleSect* > | I. Reference > | RefEntry* > | II. Reference > | RefEntry* > | > | Whereas it should be: > | > | I. part > | I. Chapter > | SimpleSect* > | II. Reference > | RefEntry* > | III. Reference > | RefEntry* > > > Anyone else want to weigh an opinion about which makes more sense? Both sensible Norm. All we need is the definitive statement about which to expect. 'Chap will be numbered in Arabic / Roman Refs will be numbered ..... [I like the regularity of the second personally] That way we couldn't argue. Regards, DaveP DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Numbering and TOC, Norman Walsh | Thread | Re: Modular Docbook v1.13 bug, Norman Walsh |
Re: generating error messages, Toby Speight | Date | Re: generating error messages, Louis-Dominique Dube |
Month |