|
Subject: RE: grouping elements From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 14:56:12 -0500 |
Hi Bas
I you use the SGML/XML kit, which is using james extension proposals you can
write your style sheet like as below:
(or-element (MRCB100-c MRCB100-d MRCB100-e)
(make sequence
(literal " ")
(process-children)
)
)
This extension has been created to resolve the problem of having more than
one element with the same rule.Notice that the rule begins with "or-element"
instead of "element".
An or-element construction rule has the syntax
(or-element (pattern+) expression)
where pattern is any pattern that could be allowed in an element
construction rule. It is equivalent to a sequence of element construction
rule
Regards
Didier PH Martin
mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.netfolder.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Bas Peters
Sent: Friday, February 19, 1999 5:24 AM
To: 'dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: grouping elements
I have a stylesheet for database records that includes the following
rules:
(element MRCB100-c
(make sequence
(literal " ")
(process-children)
)
)
(element MRCB100-d
(make sequence
(literal " ")
(process-children)
)
)
(element MRCB100-e
(make sequence
(literal " ")
(process-children)
)
)
Is there a way to group the elements in one rule that repeates the
literal statement for all elements and not for one element?
> Bas Peters
> E-mail: bpeters@xxxxxx
>
>
DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: grouping elements, Tony Graham | Thread | RE: grouping elements, STE MARIE, PAUL |
| Re: grouping elements, Tony Graham | Date | RE: Postioning Graphics side by sid, Didier PH Martin |
| Month |