Subject: Re: OpenJade and Debian From: Matthias Clasen <clasen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 01:47:12 +0200 |
> > I see from the OpenJade CVS sources that you guys *aren't* renaming > the shared library names, command names, etc. Based on that fact, for > the OpenJade Debian package, I think I'll have to make OpenJade and > Jade conflict with each other (i.e., you can't have both installed > together). Thoughts about that? > Since jade can be considered a dead end, and OpenJade its continuation under a new name, I don't think a conflict would be a big problem. But the library names still need some thinking. From a quick glance at the libtool manual, I think we should bump the library version numbers from 1.0.3 to 2.0.0. Is that correct ? -- Matthias Clasen, Tel. 0761/203-5606 Email: clasen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mathematisches Institut, Albert-Ludwigs-Universitaet Freiburg DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: OpenJade and Debian, Peter Nilsson | Thread | RE: The DSSSList Digest V3 #106, Wroth, Mark |
Re: OpenJade and Debian, Matthias Clasen | Date | RE: sgml-parse and GC, Didier PH Martin |
Month |