Subject: RE: DSSSL engine in LISP? From: "Hennessy, Sean" <shennessy@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 09:36:09 -0700 |
Frank A. Christoph wrote: >Well, this is a silly thing to argue about.. Terminology is essential to our understanding. BTW we prefer "discussions", the use of all caps would constitute an argument. If you want to have an argument please go outside. >Besides, "grove" is a common enough word that it would be a poor choice to >name something so concrete and specific. Let us walk through the metaphorical avocado and olive grove to the rain forest and consider the following.. "Forest" is too vague a term if we need to consider just the trees. We deal with a collection of SGML documents each represented logically as a rooted hierarchy. A collection of "apple" trees is commonly referred to as an "orchard". However the use of "Orchard" is specific to fruit trees. This thread is not "fruitful" therefor "Orchard" just would not fit :)) "Grove" is appropriately concrete and specific. W. Sean Hennessy "Joe Programmer" in agreement with "Joe English" DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: DSSSL engine in LISP?, Henry S. Thompson | Thread | Jade core dumps on Solaris, Bob Wysong |
Re: processing character entities, Wroth, Mark | Date | attributes in SGML to SGML, Jany Quintard |
Month |