Subject: RE: sgml-parse From: Pieter Rijken <pieter.rijken@xxxxxx> Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 09:29:38 +0200 |
Hi Brandon, > The reason that (children) and (descendants) return empty node > lists when applied to the result of (sgml-parse) is that the result is > a nodelist containing the "sgml-document" node which forms the root of > the grove. By definition, this node has no children. The > (process-children) procedure works around this by "pretending" that > the "document-element" property contains the single child of the > sgml-document. > The following alternative to (children) duplicates this: > (define kids (lambda (#!optional (nd (current-node))) > (if (equal? 'sgml-document (node-property 'class-name nd)) > (node-list-property 'document-element nd) > (children nd)))) Thank you very much!!!! This works as a 'tierelier' as we say in dutch! pieter -- Pieter Rijken E-mail: pieter.rijken@xxxxxx CMG Telecommunications and Utilities B.V. Division Advanced Technology Nieuwekade 1-19 P.O. Box 8038 Phone: +31 30 2339300 3503 RA Utrecht Fax: +31 30 2339495 The Netherlands ------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER: This statement is not an official statement from, nor does it represent an official position of, CMG Telecommunications and Utilities B.V. ------------------------------------------------------------------- DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: sgml-parse, Brandon Ibach | Thread | "nested tables" in Jade&RTF ?, Steve Weyer |
Re: processing RTF documents, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | Re: Problems with attributes., Reyes |
Month |