Subject: Re: Orthoganlity Questions From: James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat Mar 29 03:38:44 1997 EST |
At 16:21 28/03/97 +0100, Norbert Mikula wrote: >James, I think we ought to include this sub-DTD here : > ><!ENTITY % declarations "features | baseset-encoding | >literal-described-char | add-name-chars | add-separator-chars | >standard-chars | other-chars | combine-char | map-sdata-entity | >char-repertoire | sgml-grove-plan" > > >What do you think ?. I am not an expert on architectural forms. >So I am not sure how to approach this problem (if there is >one....) You don't need to change the meta-DTD for the DSSSL architecture. You only need to change the DTD used by the stylesheet. A DSSSL engine should be able to accept a style sheet using any DTD so long as it conforms to the DSSSL architecture. James
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Orthoganlity Questions, Paul Prescod | Thread | Re: Orthoganlity Questions, Paul Prescod |
Re: Design for (interactively) cust, James Clark | Date | Re: DTD for customizable stylesheet, James Clark |
Month |