| 
 
Subject: Overlapping, polygonal FOs From: Ingo Macherius <Ingo.Macherius@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 03:38:14 +0200 (MET DST)  | 
In response to my XML-article (english translation is work in progress) a
reader asked, if a flow object can have a polygonal border (compared to
rectangular) and if FOs may overlap. I guess he was comparing FO with the
Netscape <layer>-tag. 
In my (quite limited) DSSSL understanding
1) FOs never overlap but include themselves 
   (that is: a FOT is a special grove)
2) FO's are always rectangles
I remember the second point was subject to discussion and polygonal-border
FOs were added on the TODO-list for a DSSSL revision.
Q1: Is my understanding correct ?
Q2: What is the DSSSL/FOT way to represent <layer> like layout (including
    things like transparency).
Thanks in advance,
	++im
-- 
Snail : Ingo Macherius // L'Aigler Platz 4 // D-38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld
Mail  : Ingo.Macherius@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx WWW: http://www.tu-clausthal.de/~inim/
Information!=Knowledge!=Wisdom!=Truth!=Beauty!=Love!=Music==BEST (Frank Zappa)
 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
| Current Thread | 
|---|
  | 
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> | 
|---|---|---|
| Re: Is DSSSL Syntax Tricky?, Jacques Deseyne | Thread | Re: Overlapping, polygonal FOs, James Clark | 
| Re: Is DSSSL Syntax Tricky?, Paul Prescod | Date | Re: Is DSSSL Syntax Tricky?, lee | 
| Month |