Re: bug in jade??

[Taranov Alexander <tay@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Paul Prescod writes:
 > > 
 > > Taranov Alexander wrote:
 > > > 
 > > > It seems to me that
 > > > jade do not always use most specific formatting rule.
 > > 
 > > I haven't found such behavior from Jade.
 > > 
 > > As Paul Prescod pointed out, the DSSSL rules about which
 > > construction rule is applied, depend on the order in which
 > > the construction rules appear in the DSSSL spec. So you might
 > > have adjust your DSSSL spec so that the most specific rules are first.
 > 
 > For the uninformed reader it might sound like there would be problems within 
 > a single style-specification part. That isn't the case. You only run into
 > this problem when you start to modularlize your stylesheets using the 
 > DSSSL "cascading" feature.
 > 
 >  Paul Prescod
 > 
 > 
 >  DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist

After some experimenting i found out that simple change in
the order of ids in USE attribute all is OK (I just put "list"
spec before "block" one). I wonder, is it regular feature of
standard or it is just implementation-dependent feature??
Alexander

 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist